Aamir Khan Faces Fatwa Over Marriage to Gauri Spratt Days After Rs 5 Crore Death Threat: What the Religious Order Means
Aamir Khan Fatwa has once again become a widely discussed topic after a religious cleric objected to the Bollywood actor’s recent marriage to entrepreneur Gauri Spratt. The development comes only days after reports surfaced that the actor had allegedly received a death threat demanding Rs 5 crore, placing him at the centre of multiple controversies within a short span.
According to statements made by religious authorities, Maulana Ibrahim Hussain, identified as the Shahi Chief Mufti associated with the Muslim Personal Darul Ifta, has issued a fatwa concerning Aamir Khan’s third marriage. The cleric argued that the marriage is not permissible under his interpretation of Islamic law because Gauri Spratt does not belong to the Muslim faith.
The remarks have generated debate on social media as well as among legal and religious observers, especially because the couple reportedly married under India’s Special Marriage Act, a law that allows individuals of different religions to marry without requiring conversion.
Contents
Religious Objection to the Marriage
In his public statements, the Mufti said that a Muslim marrying outside the faith without the spouse accepting Islam is considered contrary to Sharia. He further stated that such marriages are viewed as sinful according to his religious interpretation and appealed to members of the Muslim community to follow religious teachings.
The cleric also expressed concern that marriages of this nature could create confusion regarding Islamic principles and negatively affect the public perception of the religion. His comments have since circulated widely through television broadcasts and online videos.
As of now, neither Aamir Khan nor his representatives have issued any public response to the remarks.
Aamir Khan Finds Himself Criticised From Opposing Sides
The latest controversy is notable because criticism directed at Aamir Khan has emerged from different ideological groups for entirely different reasons.
In recent days, some Hindutva organisations have criticised the actor over his marriages to Hindu women, alleging “love jihad,” while the latest fatwa questions his marriage from the perspective of Islamic religious law because his wife is not Muslim.
The contrasting reactions have fuelled wider discussions online about interfaith marriages, personal freedom, and the distinction between religious opinions and civil law in India.
What Is a Fatwa?
A fatwa is a formal religious opinion or interpretation issued by an Islamic scholar or Mufti on matters relating to Islamic law (Sharia). It is typically provided when individuals or communities seek guidance on religious questions involving personal conduct, marriage, inheritance, finance, or other issues governed by Islamic jurisprudence.
Contrary to a common misconception, a fatwa is not automatically a legal punishment, arrest warrant, or criminal order. In many cases, it is simply a scholarly opinion explaining how a particular action is viewed under a specific interpretation of Islamic law.
The impact of a fatwa largely depends on the religious community or individuals to whom it is addressed. It does not, by itself, have the force of law under the Indian legal system.
Who Can Issue a Fatwa?
Fatwas are generally issued by qualified Islamic scholars known as Muftis, who possess expertise in Islamic jurisprudence and religious texts. These scholars are often associated with recognised religious institutions or Darul Ifta bodies that answer questions submitted by members of the Muslim community.
Different schools of Islamic thought may sometimes reach different conclusions on the same issue. As a result, fatwas are not always universally accepted across all Muslim communities.
Why Are Fatwas Issued?
Fatwas are intended to provide religious guidance rather than enforce state law. They are commonly issued to clarify whether a particular action is considered permissible (halal), prohibited (haram), recommended, discouraged, or obligatory according to a scholar’s interpretation of Islamic teachings.
Such opinions are frequently sought on issues including marriage, divorce, inheritance, business practices, finance, medical ethics, and contemporary social matters.
In India, fatwas do not override the Constitution or decisions made by civil courts. Marriages conducted under the Special Marriage Act remain legally valid regardless of religious opinions expressed by individuals or religious organisations.
Aamir Khan’s Marriage to Gauri Spratt
Aamir Khan reportedly married his longtime partner, Gauri Spratt, in a private registered ceremony on July 5, 2026. The marriage is understood to have been solemnised under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, a law that enables interfaith and inter-caste couples in India to marry without either partner changing their religion.
Gauri Spratt is a Bengaluru-based entrepreneur associated with the beauty and wellness sector. She also has a son from her previous marriage. The couple had kept much of their relationship away from the public eye before formalising their marriage in an intimate ceremony attended by close family members and friends.
Because the marriage was reportedly registered under Indian civil law, it is legally recognised irrespective of differing religious opinions expressed by individuals or religious bodies.
A Look Back at Aamir Khan’s Previous Marriages
This is Aamir Khan’s third marriage.
He first married Reena Dutta in 1986. The couple spent over 16 years together and have two children, Junaid Khan and Ira Khan, before separating in 2002.
In 2005, Aamir married filmmaker Kiran Rao, whom he met during the making of the Oscar-nominated film Lagaan. The couple welcomed their son, Azad Rao Khan, through surrogacy in 2011. Although they announced their separation in 2021, both have continued to work together professionally and have often stated that they remain on good terms while jointly raising their son.
His marriage to Gauri Spratt marks a new chapter in the actor’s personal life and has naturally attracted considerable public attention.
Death Threat Adds Another Layer to the Controversy
The religious debate comes shortly after reports claimed that Aamir Khan had received a death threat allegedly demanding Rs 5 crore. While authorities are said to be looking into the matter, official details remain limited.
With both the alleged threat and the fatwa emerging within days of each other, the actor has found himself at the centre of national discussion, extending beyond cinema into conversations about religion, personal liberty, and public life.
Religious Opinion vs Indian Law
Legal experts have frequently pointed out that India follows a constitutional framework where marriages performed under the Special Marriage Act are governed by civil law rather than religious personal laws.
This means that while religious scholars are free to express their interpretations of faith, such opinions do not determine the legal validity of a marriage registered under Indian law.
The debate surrounding Aamir Khan’s marriage has therefore highlighted the distinction between religious guidance and constitutional rights, a subject that has surfaced repeatedly in discussions involving interfaith marriages.
No Official Response Yet
At the time of writing, Aamir Khan, Gauri Spratt, and the actor’s management team have not publicly commented on the fatwa or the statements made by the cleric.
Similarly, authorities have not announced any fresh developments regarding the reported death threat.
As the discussion continues online, the story is likely to remain in focus, particularly because it intersects issues of celebrity, religion, personal choice, and the legal framework governing marriage in India.
Regardless of the differing opinions expressed by various groups, the developments have once again brought attention to the balance between religious beliefs, freedom of choice, and the protections provided under Indian law.
